Remove GRUB removable fallback path#3971
Merged
svartkanin merged 1 commit intoarchlinux:masterfrom Dec 5, 2025
Merged
Conversation
As mentioned by @svartkanin on archlinux#3950, given we now have a way for the user to explicitly specify if they want to install to the removable location, having a fallback like this seems undesirable. On top of that, as mentioned by @correctmost on the same PR, the code that said PR introduced was bugged and would always raise an exception anyways.
Torxed
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2025
svartkanin
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As mentioned by @svartkanin on #3950, given we now have a way for the user to
explicitly specify if they want to install to the removable location, having a
fallback like this seems undesirable.
On top of that, as mentioned by @correctmost on the same PR, the code that said
PR introduced was bugged and would always raise an exception anyways.